Scenario

contenteditable="false" on child elements is not respected consistently

When a contenteditable region contains child elements with contenteditable="false", the behavior is inconsistent. Some browsers allow editing within these elements, while others correctly prevent it.

other
Scenario ID
scenario-contenteditable-readonly

Details

When a contenteditable region contains child elements with contenteditable="false", the behavior is inconsistent. Some browsers allow editing within these elements, while others correctly prevent it.

References

Scenario flow

Visual view of how this scenario connects to its concrete cases and environments. Nodes can be dragged and clicked.

React Flow mini map

Variants

Each row is a concrete case for this scenario, with a dedicated document and playground.

Case OS Device Browser Keyboard Status
ce-0040-contenteditable-readonly Any Ubuntu 22.04 Desktop or Laptop Any Chrome 120.0 US draft

Cases

Open a case to see the detailed description and its dedicated playground.

Related Scenarios

Other scenarios that share similar tags or category.

Tags: contenteditable, chrome

Auto-scroll while typing in contenteditable

Browsers try to keep the caret visible by scrolling the editable container or the page. During rapid typing—especially near the bottom or right edge—scroll updates can lag, batch, or feel jarring, so the caret temporarily leaves the viewport or the view jumps unexpectedly.

3 cases
Tags: contenteditable, chrome

Caret jumps to end after DOM manipulation in Chrome

In Chromium, programmatic DOM updates (normalization, wrapping, React reconciliation) while the user is typing can move the caret to the end of the contenteditable or to an unexpected boundary—especially when the mutation happens between keystrokes.

1 case
Tags: contenteditable, chrome

HTML Drag and Drop API with contenteditable

Using the HTML drag-and-drop API inside or alongside contenteditable regions often diverges from behavior on plain elements: default actions, `contenteditable` hit-testing, and `beforeinput`/`drop` ordering differ by browser. Custom editors must reconcile native DnD with their own selection model.

1 case
Tags: nested, contenteditable

getTargetRanges() can reference the wrong contenteditable when editors are nested

On some engines (notably Firefox for Android / Fenix), beforeinput getTargetRanges() may describe the outer contenteditable host instead of the inner focused editor. Custom handlers that trust targetRanges alone may delete or insert in the parent surface while the user believes they are typing in a nested field.

1 case

Comments & Discussion

Have questions, suggestions, or want to share your experience? Join the discussion below.